Asus Q400A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Q400A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q400A
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 03:21
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 55.3
34% 49 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 400
28% 260 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1467) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 1.66
2% 2.42 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72
521GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 347 355 354 370 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 403
Write 376
Mixed 365
SusWrite 359
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 19.7
63% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 214
158% 208 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 125%
Terra Master DAS 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 40
Write 39.1
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 8.6
24% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.3
490% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 103%
Terra Master DAS 2TB
933GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 38
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 8.4
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 106%
Terra Master DAS 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.6 8.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
Read 40.8
Write 40.1
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 8.6
24% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 7.4
1,270% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 15%
Terra Master DAS 1TB
477GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 40.1
Write 38.5
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 8.7
22% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF186D.M16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q400A Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q400A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback