Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory185.9 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, , 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 03:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6234
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 241
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 998
89% 754 Pts
64-Core 2,623
162% 2,623 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Gigabyte(1458 37C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 227
Parallax 219
177% 221 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 210
Splatting 144
162% 206 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 512GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 497 493 493 487 481 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,006
Write 504
Mixed 428
SusWrite 492
135% 607 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 57.2
244% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 305
247% 354 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 161%
Great: 321%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
918GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 490 490 488 488 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 466
Mixed 464
SusWrite 488
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 65.1
221% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 135%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 12x16GB
12 of 24 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 41.5
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback