Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.40GHz 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.4% Average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 64.2 38% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 67 8-Core 67.4 9% 67.2 Pts	64-Core 67.7 4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(A0A0 0706) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 0.34 1% 1.11 fps	MRender 0.67 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.57 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505A SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 43 49 49 46 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 165 Write 55.7 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 48.4 20% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 7.3 22% 7.1 MB/s	DQ Read 89.8 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 73.9 55% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4915, 4915 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM