PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C31 |
Motherboard | MSI B365M PRO-VH (MS-7C31) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200107 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 06 '20 at 13:35 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
74.4%
Very good
|
78% 139 Pts
|
53% 396 Pts
|
25% 405 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.4%
Average
|
44% 55.4 fps
|
48% 59.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 103 116 113 105 MB/s
|
65.9%
Good
|
43% 195 MB/s
|
110% 44.3 MB/s
|
81% 164 MB/s
|
![]() WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
305GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 69 68 68 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
54% 72.9 MB/s
|
158% 1.27 MB/s
|
|
![]() TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
257GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
6.03%
Terrible
|
18% 13.1 MB/s
|
21% 0.23 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
63.3%
Good
|
64% 22.4 GB/s
|
54% 19 GB/s
|
50% 80.3 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,523x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 540x |
Core i5-9400Intel $155Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 170x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 296x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $267Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 283x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $377 |