Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 736
69% 573 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38% Below average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 47.2
Parallax 42.1
40% 46.3 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 38.5
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 422 285 287 287 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 486
Mixed 426
SusWrite 337
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 38.8
144% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 51 80 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 85.3
Write 77.2
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 73.1
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
30GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 68
Mixed 53
SusWrite 67.7
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 68%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 109 109 111 111 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 104
150% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 0.5 78 34 6.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 90
SusWrite 34.7
116% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 109 28 80 101 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
Read 116
Write 126
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 76.1
135% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 2.2
98% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 32.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 28.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback