Today's hottest deals

MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory110.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 19:28
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 228
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 857
79% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,824
113% 1,824 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 97.8
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 159
80% 113 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 93.4
Splatting 119
86% 103 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$69
59GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1406
Write 1,457
Mixed 1,239
306% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 33.6
127% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 525
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 403
314% 434 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250GB
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 1229 1195 1187 1153 1234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 1,657
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 1,230
358% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 50.7
162% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 424
310% 408 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 225%
Great: 380%
Kingston SUV500960G 960GB
132GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 362 148 234 143 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 401
Write 370
Mixed 319
SusWrite 248
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 25.6
83% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 167
152% 234 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 93%
Areca ARAID5ARD6TB 28TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 208 228 227 225 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.3% Poor
Read 114
Write 257
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 227
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 2.8
30% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 5.6
6% 9.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 39%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 509 508 509 507 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
608GB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 99 100 100 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
1GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5.2
Write 24.7
Mixed 18
12% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
0GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.8
Write 57.5
Mixed 52.4
74% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 74%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
25GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 16.7
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 17.7
28% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
127% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
146% Outstanding
MC Read 60.8
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 59.1
167% 58.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 146%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback