Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '17 at 16:59
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 131
55% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 218
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.2% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 68
Parallax 58.4
34% 56.1 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 56.8
46% 56.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
36GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 390
Mixed 414
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 41.5
148% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 110
115% 191 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 456
Write 111
Mixed 153
52% 240 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 12.3
76% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 86.8
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 22.8
40% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 11.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback