HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 22:15
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3687U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 78
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 87.1
48% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 131
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.04
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB800G6R 800GB
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G201DL2B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 419 423 425 427 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 332
Write 427
Mixed 318
SusWrite 421
85% 374 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 32.8
114% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 237
180% 243 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 95%
Intel 525 Series mSATA 120GB-$119
111GB free
Firmware: LLLi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 140 140 139 141 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64% Good
Read 386
Write 156
Mixed 202
SusWrite 137
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 29.4
103% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 178
136% 185 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback