HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 21:46
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 94%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3687U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 76.6
43% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 112
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.81 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 6.96
4% 4.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB800G6R 800GB
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G201DL2B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 399 398 410 409 407 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 315
Write 405
Mixed 301
SusWrite 402
81% 356 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 28
101% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 229
173% 234 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 95%
Intel 525 Series mSATA 120GB-$119
111GB free
Firmware: LLLi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 146 142 147 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 390
Write 160
Mixed 201
SusWrite 140
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 28.4
96% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 177
135% 183 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback