Today's hottest deals

ECS H61H2-MV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140813
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 10:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 126
59% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 199
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.19
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 1.74
2% 1.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 23 67 71 76 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 89.3
Write 78
Mixed 23
SusWrite 62.1
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 103%
USB Mass Storage Device 32GB
15GB free, PID 168a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.2
Write 2.5
SusWrite 12.8
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.4
134% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8783 EVMT4G1333U86S 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-MV Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-MV - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback