Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory32.8 GB free of 44 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121211
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '20 at 11:45
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 165
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 519
48% 403 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 18.4
17% 20.8 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 22.3
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 173 145 136 135 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 304
Write 220
Mixed 235
SusWrite 143
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 34.3
118% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 168
147% 221 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
180GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 137 164 150 162 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 160
Mixed 100
SusWrite 144
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$210
169GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 131 145 147 137 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 98%
ST2000LM003 HN-M 2TB
380GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 63 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 94.3
Write 72.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 62
90% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 32%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
329GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 67 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 73.8
Write 71.8
Mixed 54
SusWrite 66.5
90% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 32.9
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback