Pelco DSSRV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPelco DSSRV  (all builds)
MotherboardTo DSSRV
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120509
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 02:12
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 169
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 445
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
MSI(1462 1573) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 0.91
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3
2% 3.04 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 83 88 92 100 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 99
Write 101
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 90.8
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.B1GDE.AF1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DSSRV Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pelco DSSRV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback