Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 70.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 301
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,077
100% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,437
89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 140
Parallax 118
101% 127 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 127
Splatting 108
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 230 231 253 230 234 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 446
Write 273
Mixed 335
SusWrite 240
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 27
89% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 115
98% 147 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 69%
Adata Classic C008 USB 2.0 16GB-$16
10GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.5
Mixed 4.3
5% 3.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback