HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1972
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 162
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 392
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 1972) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 2.62
3% 3.52 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 6.78
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 208 454 210 0.7 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
Samsung P3 Portable 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: 1306
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 68
Mixed 53.8
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback