Acer Veriton M4610G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M4610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4610G
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 15:45
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 129
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 272
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.11 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 373 46 2.1 61 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 337
Write 398
Mixed 392
SusWrite 91.8
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 4.4
DQ Mixed 0.3
26% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 92%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
63GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 115 119 116 104 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.2% Above average
Read 222
Write 222
Mixed 221
SusWrite 127
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 32.4
109% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 144
122% 178 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 155 138 126 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 133
Write 117
Mixed 84
SusWrite 141
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 96%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
77GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 33
Write 26.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 21.9
35% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.7
252% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 46%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
614GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 106 95 93 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 46
SusWrite 97.9
138% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 52%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
274GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 84 62 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 124
Write 113
Mixed 89
SusWrite 64.5
128% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
120% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
224GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 84 59 34 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 73.7
Write 73.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 62.5
91% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4610G Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback