Acer Veriton M4610G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M4610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4610G
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 04:30
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 150
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 277
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.59
1% 0.95 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 142 308 2.9 2.5 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 461
Write 416
Mixed 7
SusWrite 76.6
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 92%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
63GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 88 88 69 77 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.6% Above average
Read 253
Write 236
Mixed 211
SusWrite 106
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 33.5
111% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 129
113% 170 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 103 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 108
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73%
Great: 96%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
77GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 35
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 21.7
35% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.8
217% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 46%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
614GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 107 117 111 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 146
Write 143
Mixed 20
SusWrite 110
134% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 52%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
274GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 80 85 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 123
Write 123
Mixed 89
SusWrite 82.4
139% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
224GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 80 84 84 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 75.2
Write 76.3
Mixed 62
SusWrite 82.2
101% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 99U5403-067.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4610G Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback