Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-D3  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 16:00
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 135
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 306
31% 252 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 13.1
12% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 15.1
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 70 72 65 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 227
Write 73
Mixed 107
SusWrite 66.3
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 23.4
88% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 72.1
DQ Mixed 33.3
30% 44 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
205GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 123 123 124 124 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 119
68% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
81GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 123 123 124 123 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 153
Write 127
Mixed 32
SusWrite 119
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 173 176 177 176 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 151
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 171
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 169
Mixed 32.8
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
30GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.5 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 27.7
Mixed 27
SusWrite 4
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
14GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 27.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 0
26% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
176GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 28
Write 27.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 0.1
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 56%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 27.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 26.1
36% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.5
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-D3 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback