HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory49.8 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 07:26
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 165
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 584
54% 452 Pts
64-Core 1202
74% 1202 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 80.1
52% 70.5 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 54.8
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M500_MTFD 960GB
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 372 362 368 357 359 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 398
Write 378
Mixed 311
SusWrite 366
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 31.4
111% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 153
140% 214 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
Micron_M500_MTFD 960GB
862GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 354 353 354 354 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 398
Write 346
Mixed 304
SusWrite 354
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 29.3
103% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 156
144% 221 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 82%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
53GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 440 437 437 433 432 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,053
Write 834
Mixed 852
SusWrite 496
181% 809 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 65.2
213% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 569
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 522
391% 522 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 162%
Great: 302%
Seagate ST2000NM0045 2TB
930GB free
Firmware: N002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 168 169 171 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 81
SusWrite 169
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.5
297% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 112%
Netapp X411_HVIPC420A15 450GB
320GB free
Firmware: NA02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 178
Write 72.5
Mixed 82
SusWrite 73.2
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
771GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 133 133 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 132
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 100%
LSI Logical Volume 1TB
768GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 334 334 335 333 328 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 79% Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351R7BFR8A-H9 Hynix HMT351R7BFR8A-H9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 56GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.3% Very good
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback