bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '20 at 07:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 131
49% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 577
44% 393 Pts
64-Core 1,794
111% 1,794 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 119 118 123 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 504
Write 392
Mixed 448
SusWrite 122
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 16.5
60% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 193
144% 191 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
97GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 128 136 128 127 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 490
Write 366
Mixed 442
SusWrite 128
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 15.9
56% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 194
142% 188 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 64 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback