bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH67CL
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121204
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '17 at 21:47
Run Duration	589 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 185 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 359 48% 359 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% PwrHis(1787 2288) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 13 12% 13.1 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 12.8 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 73 (03) Spinup time 129 129 21494169892 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3536 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14770 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2178 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3595 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3595 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 231928758311 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2	77.1% Very good	Read 148 Write 121 Mixed 131 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.23 63% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 108%
WD WD1600ADFD-60NLR1 160GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21.07QR5 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 197 0 (03) Spinup time 164 163 4808 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 560 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 25 25 55396 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 540 (C2) HDA temperature 99 96 48 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 43 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.5% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 65.2 Mixed 65 48% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.51 116% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 49%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 46GB free Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 42.2 Write 49.6 Mixed 48.5 35% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.41 89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 32%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 16GB free Firmware: ZM100-41 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5760 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14437 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25259 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7097 (BB) vendor-specific 73 73 28 (BE) vendor-specific 124 94 38 (C2) HDA temperature 124 94 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 91018 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	27% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 45.6 Mixed 48.2 36% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.37 82% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 33%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 15GB free Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 57 42 29817161 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20967 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 1460881891651 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25921 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9481 (C2) HDA temperature 42 47 47244640298 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 42 29817161 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 6 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	19.7% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 40.6 Mixed 39.8 27% 36 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.34 74% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 256GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 35 Write 33.7 Mixed 33.4 44% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.32 72% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 191GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 24 Mixed 28.4 35% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.28 68% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 20%
EPSON Stylus Storage 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 6GB free, PID null Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Read 5.43 Write 3.29 Mixed 3.57 5% 4.09 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.009 4% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG CL9-9-9 DDR3 1600 NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG CL9-9-9 DDR3 1600 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.9% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,059x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,590x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	948x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $31Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	521x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	300x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353