Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 144 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 438 45% 364 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 77%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 256GB-$48 2,939 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.W Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 406 Write 328 Mixed 288 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 19.7 64% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 68.1 117% 226 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 110%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 831GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 418 Write 334 Mixed 358 82% 370 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 27.6 92% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 260 209% 290 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 253 Write 196 Mixed 237 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 35.1 121% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 195 146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 8x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 37.1 MC Mixed 32.7 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	500x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	309x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	57x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373