VIT P2400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVIT P2400  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-1485
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 12:01
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 101
51% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 156
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10C0) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 2.53
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 7.04
4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 148 133 134 126 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 482
Write 422
Mixed 367
SusWrite 165
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
33% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3150ED58E8W1600 Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P2400 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: VIT P2400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback