Alienware Aurora R9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora R9  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0T76PD
Memory15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '20 at 00:28
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$245
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 85.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 265
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,071
98% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Dell(1028 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 54.6
Parallax 44.4
38% 48.8 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 61.8
48% 59 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc601 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 358 354 362 362 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,110
Write 360
Mixed 469
SusWrite 358
126% 574 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 47.1
202% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 425
320% 432 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 147%
Great: 191%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
810GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 47 49 44 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 16
Write 83.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 50.3
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 19%
Great: 113%
Apricorn SATAWire 6G 1TB
434GB free
Firmware: 1411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 14 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.68% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 18.5
10% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.68%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown X5H5PW-MIE 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 21
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 21.5
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R9 Builds (Compare 906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $711
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback