Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 117
2-Core 227
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 450
61% 456 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 39.3
37% 43 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 36
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 5.1 9.2 38 144 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 415
Write 337
Mixed 283
SusWrite 107
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 19.8
74% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 49
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 32.3
35% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50
108GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 199 184 192 188 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 378
Write 276
Mixed 237
SusWrite 197
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 26.4
158% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 207
188% 288 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 106%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
223GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 205 102 91 88 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 460
Write 397
Mixed 339
SusWrite 139
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 42.5
159% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 138
146% 243 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0 0 0 0 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 41.7
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 0.9
39% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 71%
ST332082 0AS 320GB
78GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 17.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 5.1
27% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 28%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-60A7B2 500GB
317GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 38.3
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 36.7
50% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback