Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '16 at 00:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 145
50% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 365
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 8.12
6% 6.99 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.58 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
D2RSTK251E19-0400 400GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.20 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 499
Write 237
Mixed 313
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 9.2
40% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 9.18
10% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 68%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
758GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 141
Write 130
Mixed 144
105% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.17
67% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3N169ES4.16FE Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 859B BLS4G3N169ES4.16FE Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback