Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+ (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 05:35
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 71 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 148 58% 99 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 238 29% 223 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% PowerColor(148C 2379) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 62.6 Parallax 83.4 49% 68.7 fps	MRender 63.1 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 51.7 47% 58 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
As25 480GB 480GB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X14c07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 340 342 333 346 333 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 335 Write 305 Mixed 279 SusWrite 331 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 30.4 103% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 139 115% 163 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 105%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 343GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 423 421 410 427 354 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 426 Mixed 411 SusWrite 399 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 50.1 166% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 250 189% 253 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-17000CL11-4GBXL F3-17000CL11-4GBXL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 12.6 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75M Pro4+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

CPU
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	3x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	2x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	1x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG 16GBHynixBench 31%, 7 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406