Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 600
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 742
46% 742 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
MSI(1462 8D91) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.8% Good
Lighting 89
Reflection 86.4
Parallax 75.5
72% 83.6 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 74.6
62% 75.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 95 139 148 165 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 170
Write 166
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 136
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
230GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 98
Write 73.5
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 96.3
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
912GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 124 132 134 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 178
Write 180
Mixed 105
SusWrite 131
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R534G1601U1S 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback