ECS H61H2-M16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H61H2-M16 (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120927
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$31 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 160 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 221 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 7D8B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2843 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74 4,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 89 61 54 47 56 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.5% Above average	Read 256 Write 148 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 74.6 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 28.6 102% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 28.7 58% 119 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 83%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 656GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 103 105 106 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 106 Mixed 58 SusWrite 102 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 448GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 79 81 84 79 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 76.8 Write 75.3 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 80.7 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 6.5 12 16 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 16.7 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 13.6 22% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.2 138% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung V-GeN D3V4GL16B8R 86D3 SP008GLLTU160N02 12GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 11.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61H2-M16 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M16

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	11x
Core i5-3340Intel $278Bench 66%, 8,792 samples	5x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	3x
AS-128 128GBBench 62%, 36 samples	3x
SU680 256GBAdataBench 76%, 47 samples	3x

RAM
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 5,493 samples	7x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
99U5471-034.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 48%, 200 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353