QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory62.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 62.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory59.9 GB free of 62.4023 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 16:11
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 80
2-Core 165
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 472
44% 368 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 61.6
33% 51.9 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 48.8
42% 51.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
952GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 92 183 215 161 156 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.9% Very poor
Read 171
Write 78.4
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 134
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
6% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 62GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 14748 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback