PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 16.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 62.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 62.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds) |
Motherboard | |
Memory | 59.9 GB free of 62.4023 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20150206 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 20 '19 at 16:11 |
Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
952GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 92 183 215 161 156 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
QEMU 62GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 14748 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples | 42x |
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples | 21x |
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 37x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 30x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 28x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $499 |