Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 03:18
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 74
44% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 173
18% 146 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Zotac(19DA 3438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 49.8
44% 55.4 fps
MRender 75.4
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 69
57% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron XTi 480GB-$247
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC02.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 267 309 334 325 265 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 467
Write 419
Mixed 317
SusWrite 297
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 31.1
115% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 132
124% 193 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 148 152 155 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 103
Write 153
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 152
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.7
253% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 92%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 146 147 146 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 110
SusWrite 145
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 87%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Read 24
Write 13
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 13.8
17% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C11D3L Corsair CM3X2G1600C9D KHX1866C10D3/ Corsair CM3X2G1600C9D 20GB
933, 533, 933, 533 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 8.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback