Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 23:58
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 696
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 110
Parallax 113
92% 112 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 102
Splatting 92.6
93% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 813 598 583 588 608 584 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,487
Write 1,204
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 629
251% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 75.9
252% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 909
686% 920 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 217%
Great: 340%
M.2 SATA III SSD 240GB
178GB free
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 280 277 278 279 277 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 384
Mixed 396
SusWrite 287
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 40.8
145% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 194
177% 269 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 94%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
87GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 485 475 486 492 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 492
Mixed 368
SusWrite 484
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 57.6
200% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 339
265% 364 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 128%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
365GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 150 160 163 163 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 180
Mixed 38
SusWrite 160
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 31.9
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 26.9
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback