Today's hottest deals

Huanan X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardHuanan X79  (all builds)
Memory32.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 15:53
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 157
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 486
49% 398 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.9
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
D3-120 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T161118b
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 431
Write 365
Mixed 359
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 23
88% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 85.2
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 83.4
84% 130 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 71%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
48GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 64
Write 61.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 102
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
196GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 84 86 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 84.6
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 58%
JMicron Generic DISK01 320GB
285GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 49 46 49 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 96.8
Write 98
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 48.1
99% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
106GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 48 45 48 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 81.3
Write 90.3
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 47.4
92% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
58GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.3% Very poor
Read 38
Write 81.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 38.2
71% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 28%
JMicron Generic DISK01 320GB
240GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 39 37 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 38.5
98% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 30%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
29GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.68% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 13.2
Mixed 21
SusWrite 12.3
23% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.3
72% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70EMB- M393B5170EH1- M393B5170EH1- 39GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
32767, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huanan X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback