Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 05:06
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$325
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,155
103% 871 Pts
64-Core 2,014
125% 2,014 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.9% Good
Lighting 77.5
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 74.2
63% 81 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 103
77% 93.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 315 316 316 303 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 435
Mixed 438
SusWrite 319
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 51.6
170% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 186
140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
479GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 428 433 435 433 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 436
Mixed 432
SusWrite 433
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 52.2
172% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 186
140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 192 192 192 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 187
Mixed 86
SusWrite 191
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 9.7 8.7 8.3 9.5 9.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 122
Write 50.8
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 10.4
61% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
123% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 38.2
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback