PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 7.1 GB free of 10.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 02 '19 at 04:12 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | EGY-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
|
65.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATI FirePro V5800 (FireGL V)
Device(13CC 3D20) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.100.0.0
|
5.59%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
381GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 100 100 100 100 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 56 73 65 79 72 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 44GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 580x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 548x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 500x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 282x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 158x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 139x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 139x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 74x |
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $255 |