Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80M8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80M8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G51-35
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 20:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 73.3
37% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 121
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3807) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 3.78
2% 3.69 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.89 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 76 56 61 57 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 405
Write 343
Mixed 290
SusWrite 83.1
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 10.8
62% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 104
105% 169 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80M8 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80M8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback