MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B77
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 15:19
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 712
67% 558 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 19.2
17% 18.7 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 16.5
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 404 393 384 377 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1683
Write 1,659
Mixed 788
SusWrite 440
255% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 43
147% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 406
298% 392 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 157%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
89GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 350 322 305 298 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 467
Mixed 404
SusWrite 338
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 49.6
163% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 129 129 129 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 122
Mixed 93
SusWrite 128
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
937GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 146 147 144 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 151
Write 114
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 146
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 27.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback