Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 23:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 221
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 555
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 50.9
Parallax 54.5
36% 50 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 36.4
34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 484
Mixed 319
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 46
158% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 180
181% 293 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Synology iSCSI Storage 1.5TB
232GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 301 295 289 285 281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 189
Write 351
Mixed 277
SusWrite 286
63% 276 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 81.9
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 103
78% 103 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback