Today's hottest deals

Medionpc MS-7713

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7713  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7713
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101231
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 86
43% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Gigabyte(1458 3520) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.38 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 171 142 144 144 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 227
Write 202
Mixed 208
SusWrite 156
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 26.3
92% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 110
91% 131 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 39 31 44 47 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 48.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 38
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 63%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 202a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 58 59 58 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.3% Below average
Read 107
Write 87.7
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 58.7
100% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 33%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
759GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.45% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 22.2
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 14
16% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.45%
Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
1TB free, PID 202a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 59 59 58 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 40
Mixed 53
SusWrite 59.3
77% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 32%
Apple iPod 120GB
67GB free, PID 1261
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 19.5
Mixed 13
SusWrite 13.9
21% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 13%
SV FAST 6TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 107 107 109 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.3% Good
Read 182
Write 156
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 109
151% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.2
200% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 8GB
667, 200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7713 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7713

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback