Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 10:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 177
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 534
50% 416 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 11D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 25.2
23% 26.1 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 24.3
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 502 547 245 145 214 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 1,052
Write 234
Mixed 558
SusWrite 299
118% 536 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 26.9
131% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 63
122% 241 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 114%
Great: 101%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
874GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 140 140 140 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 147
Write 134
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 137
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
251% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD_F570ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback