Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 13:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Memory 6.55
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 89.8
26% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 78.6
11% 83.3 Pts
64-Core 82.7
5% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 25
Parallax 31.6
21% 27.5 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 26.5
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 250GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 48 50 52 52 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 40
Write 69.7
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 44.7
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 6.2
745% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 44%
Virtual Disk 859GB
151GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 50 50 53 52 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 28.5
Mixed 68
SusWrite 45.4
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 5.6
752% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.2
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.8
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 437
9% 437 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $158Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback