Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 25 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 758
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
Asus(1043 04A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.3% Good
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 124
68% 88.5 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 95.7
Splatting 75.5
63% 76.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$60
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM14.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 299 138 171 122 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 867
Write 878
Mixed 381
SusWrite 166
128% 573 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 49.3
125% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 190
212% 373 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 153%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
951GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 155 152 155 151 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 168
Mixed 37
SusWrite 153
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 19.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback