Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 759
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 1297
80% 1297 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 85.4
55% 74 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 56.9
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$65
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 636 638 644 632 595 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,027
Write 1,739
Mixed 698
SusWrite 672
285% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 59.8
217% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 750
602% 844 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 229%
Great: 254%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$56
222GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43% Average
Read 69.8
Write 63.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 79.5
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$56
138GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 65 71 74 74 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 93.5
Write 82
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 70.7
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic 360GB
203GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 269 264 125 67 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 344
Mixed 313
SusWrite 173
397% 303 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 11.2
1,764% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 45.8
DQ Mixed 11.8
2,026% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 216%
Great: 224%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
344GB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 119 115 119 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 111
Write 82
Mixed 69
SusWrite 116
126% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
25GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 34 9.9 15 18 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 52.5
Write 38.8
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 22.4
51% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.4
101% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 32
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback