Today's hottest deals

Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 12:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2715QE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 144
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 352
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 19
17% 21.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 22.9
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 189 190 187 192 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 235
Write 208
Mixed 209
SusWrite 190
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 24.6
84% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 152
120% 166 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 100%
OOS2000G 2TB
1.5TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 200 201 201 201 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 189
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 201
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 117%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-001.A00LF 99P5471-033.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback