Today's hottest deals

Notebook P775DM3(-G)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P775DM3(-G)  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P775DM3(-G)
Memory50.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161221
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 00:16
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 232
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 695
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 1299 536 359 469 386 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,058
Write 1436
Mixed 849
SusWrite 745
282% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 62.3
238% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 440
429% 706 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 238%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 485 485 485 485 487 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
125% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 483
Mixed 421
SusWrite 483
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 57.5
189% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 363
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 125%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
946GB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 62.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 94.2
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix GKE160SO102408-2400 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 28
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 26.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P775DM3(-G) Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Notebook P775DM3(-G)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback