Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision WorkStation R5400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation R5400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FX173
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 23:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 84.1
40% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 274
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 61.7
53% 65.2 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 55.5
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 131 122 128 126 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.6% Good
Read 235
Write 101
Mixed 214
SusWrite 136
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 32.6
114% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 151
124% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 85%
WD Re 2TB-$30
1TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 35 36 39 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 17.8
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 37.7
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 26%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 19%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation R5400 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision WorkStation R5400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback