Today's hottest deals

Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba PORTEGE Z30-C  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PORTEGE Z30-C
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 15:47
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MDG-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 39.3
1-Core 4.2
2-Core 22.9
17% 22.1 Pts
4-Core 18.5
8-Core 51.8
4% 35.2 Pts
64-Core 55.7
3% 55.7 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Toshiba(1179 0015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6615
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 6.09
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 13.8
8% 8.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTN512HDJH-00000 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2107Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 58 59 55 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 343
Write 322
Mixed 277
SusWrite 102
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 43.1
DQ Mixed 50.7
53% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
590GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 93.5
Write 91.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 92
104% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PORTEGE Z30-C Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback