Today's hottest deals

Asrock A780GXE/128M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A780GXE/128M  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100525
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9550
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 65.5
32% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 130
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 16.8
16% 17.2 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 16.6
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 34 38 20 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 131
Write 105
Mixed 101
SusWrite 41.4
21% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 11.1
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 16
13% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
171GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 53 53 53 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 156
Write 145
Mixed 72
SusWrite 52.1
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
71GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 53 52 52 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 52.4
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 51.7
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
651GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 39 38 20 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 142
Write 114
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 43.6
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
233GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 20.7
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 15.2
14% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 36%
Seagate ST3500830A 500GB-$149
466GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.4
Write 14.5
Mixed 14.4
11% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 42%
WDC WD64 00BEVT-22A0RT0 640GB
498GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 13 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 13.5
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 13.7
19% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A780GXE/128M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asrock A780GXE/128M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback