Asus A_F_K20CE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus A_F_K20CE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A_F_K20CE
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '19 at 06:26
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J3710
BGA 1170, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 52.3
31% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 81.2
8-Core 59.8
10% 70.5 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8670) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.23
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.78
3% 3.84 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 5
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 175
Mixed 174
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 10.4
65% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 72.2
75% 123 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
6GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 155
Mixed 96.8
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
USB 2TB
62GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.4
Write 28.1
Mixed 39.9
35% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
136% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 89%
Multiple Card Reader 8GB
1GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.5
Write 10
Mixed 7
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_F_K20CE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A_F_K20CE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback