Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 02:43
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 247
92% 162 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 869
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.53
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 135
Parallax 114
103% 125 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 123
Splatting 104
87% 106 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1318 1313 1263 1250 1100 892 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,130
Write 1,393
Mixed 634
SusWrite 1,189
297% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 55.5
187% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 815
607% 808 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 252%
Great: 292%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
95GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 468 464 467 472 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 484
Mixed 402
SusWrite 465
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 56
185% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
284GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 469 465 469 439 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 484
Mixed 457
SusWrite 433
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 51.4
173% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
378GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 90 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 126
Write 91.7
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 89.1
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$69
2TB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 197 201 201 146 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 119
Write 134
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 180
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
243% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 113%
H/W RAID 0 (Spanning) 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 26 24 24 23 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
Read 74.5
Write 94.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 25.4
81% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 19%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3400 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 28
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 31.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback