Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 19:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 98.9
52% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 192
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 94.3
48% 73.4 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 56.7
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 307 317 322 325 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 336
Write 306
Mixed 307
SusWrite 306
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 35.1
114% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 83
DQ Mixed 49.3
41% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
373GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 122 125 128 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 112
Write 89
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 125
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF 99U5471-025.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback